For Wednesday, 15 May

    • Usama Kahf, ‘Arabic Hip-Hop: Claims of Authenticity and Identity of a New Genre’, in Forman and Neal (2012)

This is absolutely timely and worth reading; unfortunately, I think we’re going to have to devote the entire period to Story Map-troubleshooting. Highly recommended, and it would count as a reference to an official assignment, were you to work it into your final project; but this would be the one instance where I would not expect you to have done the assigned reading before class.

In Class

    1. Attendance
    2. Story Maps: Logistics & Small Group Huddles
    3. Reading Notes for Next Time

For Next Time

  • TBA

For Monday, 13 May

In Class

  1. Attendance
  2. Q&A: Is DJ Screw really to blame for Drake?
  3. Reading Notes for Next Time

For Next Time

  • Usama Kahf, ‘Arabic Hip-Hop: Claims of Authenticity and Identity of a New Genre’, in Forman and Neal (2012)

For Wednesday, 8 May

Since we didn’t get a chance to really dig into Monday’s assignments, we’ll try to find some time to talk about them on Wednesday. Much of the class will be dedicated to final projects, however.

  • Review: Matt Miller, ‘Rap’s Dirty South: From Subculture to Pop Culture’, (password-protected PDF) in Forman and Neal (2012)
  • Video: ‘How the triplet flow took over rap’Vox (15 September 2017). Take careful notes. You must list at least three details from the video (an interesting fact or research finding, an intriguing hypothesis, some provocative claim); note the time stamp or approximate duration (e.g., 3m41s, or 3:41-5:25) and provide an annotation for each item. For example, you might question the way the author interprets a research finding; or you might speculate as to how a hypothesis might apply to a related topic; or you might explain what confuses you about a particular claim. I’d say this double-entry chart on the New York Times learning blog is geared more towards critically watching narrative fiction, but looking at it should give you a sense of what I’m looking for here. I won’t ask you to turn this in (unless you miss class), but I will cold-call a good bit to see what you noticed.

In Class

  1. Attendance
  2. Story Maps Accounts
  3. Small Group Pow-wows
  4. Q&A: What exactly is ‘dirty’ about the ‘Dirty South’?
  5. Reading Notes for Next Time

For Next Time

For Monday, 6 May

  • Matt Miller, ‘Rap’s Dirty South: From Subculture to Pop Culture’, (password-protected PDF) in Forman and Neal (2012)
  • Video: ‘How the triplet flow took over rap’Vox (15 September 2017). Take careful notes. You must list at least three details from the video (an interesting fact or research finding, an intriguing hypothesis, some provocative claim); note the time stamp or approximate duration (e.g., 3m41s, or 3:41-5:25) and provide an annotation for each item. For example, you might question the way the author interprets a research finding; or you might speculate as to how a hypothesis might apply to a related topic; or you might explain what confuses you about a particular claim. I’d say this double-entry chart on the New York Times learning blog is geared more towards critically watching narrative fiction, but looking at it should give you a sense of what I’m looking for here. I won’t ask you to turn this in (unless you miss class), but I will cold-call a good bit to see what you noticed.

In Class

  1. Attendance
  2. Q&A: What exactly is ‘dirty’ about the ‘Dirty South’?
  3. Reading Notes for Next Time

For Next Time

For Wednesday, 1 May

Prep

  • Gilbert B. Rodman, ‘Race … and Other Four-Letter Words: Eminem and the Cultural Politics of Authenticity’ (password-protected PDF), in Forman and Neal (2012)
  • Video: Adam Neely, ‘Scotch Snaps in Hip-Hop’ (11 March 2019). Take careful notes. You must list at least three details from the video (an interesting fact or research finding, an intriguing hypothesis, some provocative claim); note the time stamp or approximate duration (e.g., 3m41s, or 3:41-5:25) and provide an annotation for each item. For example, you might question the way the author interprets a research finding; or you might speculate as to how a hypothesis might apply to a related topic; or you might explain what confuses you about a particular claim. I’d say this double-entry chart on the New York Times learning blog is geared more towards critically watching narrative fiction, but looking at it should give you a sense of what I’m looking for here. I won’t ask you to turn this in (unless you miss class), but I will cold-call a good bit to see what you noticed.

In Class

  1. Attendance
  2. Q&A: Is cultural appropriation always a bad thing?
  3. Reading Notes for Next Time

For Next Time

For Wednesday, 17 April

Prep

In Class

  1. Attendance
  2. Q&A: What do feminists hear when they listen to hip-hop?
  3. Reading Notes for Next Time

For Next Time

For Monday, 15 April

Prep

We didn’t get very far in discussing Baldwin, so let’s finish the job on Monday.

In Class

  1. Attendance
  2. Q&A: Was gangsta rap the real conscious rap?
  3. Reading Notes for Next Time

For Next Time

For Wednesday, 10 April

Prep

In Class

  1. Attendance
  2. Q&A: Was gangsta rap the real conscious rap?
  3. Reading Notes for Next Time

For Next Time

For Monday, 8 April

Prep

In Class

  1. Attendance
  2. Q&A: Where does keepin’ it real go wrong?
  3. Reading Notes for Next Time

For Next Time